Evaluation Item: Two (2) Minute Dialogue
Overview
Engage in a 2-minute dialogue with a stranger
Submission Guidelines
- Situation: Engineering or scientific conference reception.
- The topic and English used should be appropriate for this situation.
- You must: Open → Discuss → Invite → Close the dialogue.
- You should consult writing tools to improve your English (e.g. ChatGPT, Grammarly, Co-Pilot)
Part A: Presentation
if(your pair's name is called){
Come to the front of the room;
Write your name on the blackboard;
Perform you dialogue;
Return to your seats;
}else{fill in the table below;}
|
Part B: Communication Check
if(your name called){
Come to the front of the room;
Give the speakers names;
Summarize the topic & discussion;
Will they meet again?;
}
|
Names: | A(red): | B(lack):
|
---|
Topic:
|
Outline:
| 1.
|
2.
|
3.
|
Meet again? |
|
Evaluation Criteria (20 points)
Section | Item | Points
|
---|
A | B | MAX
|
---|
Timing | Subtract 1 point for every 20s out [1'40" 2'20"] Start: Stop: | | 5
|
Content
| Do you follow the protocol for the dialogue?
| | |
|
| 9
|
Are the topics discussed appropriate for a conference reception?
| | |
|
Does the conversation flow logically?
| | |
|
Presentation
| Do you speak with few grammatical errors?
| | |  
|
|
| 6
|
Is your pronunciation clear? | | |
|
Do you speak without stumbling? | | |
|
Do your sentences flow well? | | |
|
Can your presentation be heard clearly? | | |
|
Did you the read presentation? Did you make eye contact? | | |
|
T. Teacher Evaluation Total | | | 20
|
C. Communication Factor: (±10%) | | ±/2
|
Each Section marks: 0-Bad, 1-Poor, 2-Needs improvement, 3-OK, 4-Good, 5-Excellent.
Each Sub-Section: [ needs work | OK | excellent ]